Mankind.....
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:25 am
-MANKIND: THE STORY OF ALL OF US-


**************



-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:25 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=2
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:26 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=3
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:26 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=4
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:27 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=5
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:27 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=6
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:28 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=7
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:28 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=8
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:29 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=9
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:29 am
-cRsQr4glz55zEwUwGlGUP&index=10
/ 526 posts
16 Nov 20 2:31 am *
A Most Interesting And Informative Series, Aye.....



P.S. And Womankind Too, Of Course.....
/ 220 posts
18 Nov 20 11:55 pm
Yeah....I get 'Mankind' refers to everyone but it feels more accurate to say Humankind. But anyway. A really good book about humanity is 'Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari.' Very informative and a real mind opener! ; - )
/ 526 posts
19 Nov 20 1:47 am
Thanks, Karl...I'll check it out. ;)
/ 220 posts
05 Apr 21 7:52 pm
Point I was trying to make is you have Man and Woman but they are both Human. Considering that it feels more accurate to say Humankind because when someone says Mankind, to me it suggests only the male of the species. But then again....maybe I'm being pedantic? I don't know, it's just the first impression I get. In the book Sapiens the writer refers to humans simply as Sapiens.
/ 526 posts
08 May 21 3:48 am
/ 20 posts
27 Jan 22 2:12 pm *
Karl wrote:
Point I was trying to make is you have Man and Woman but they are both Human. Considering that it feels more accurate to say Humankind because when someone says Mankind, to me it suggests only the male of the species. But then again....maybe I'm being pedantic? I don't know, it's just the first impression I get. In the book Sapiens the writer refers to humans simply as Sapiens.


I’m thinking you’re just trying to be balanced about it. The word mankind was probably made up by men since back then women didn’t have as much rights or certain privileges probably because rulers and emperor who were mostly men believed in crazy shit and enforced beliefs upon civilizations throughout generations like “men and only men are superior” and didn’t give women as much credit as compared to today. Thankfully it’s not like back then. Back then sucked in terms of everyone having rights.
/ 220 posts
27 Jan 22 7:03 pm
Blake_MetalHead wrote:
Karl wrote:
Point I was trying to make is you have Man and Woman but they are both Human. Considering that it feels more accurate to say Humankind because when someone says Mankind, to me it suggests only the male of the species. But then again....maybe I'm being pedantic? I don't know, it's just the first impression I get. In the book Sapiens the writer refers to humans simply as Sapiens.


I’m thinking you’re just trying to be balanced about it. The word mankind was probably made up by men since back then women didn’t have as much rights or certain privileges probably because rulers and emperor who were mostly men believed in crazy shit and enforced beliefs upon civilizations throughout generations like “men and only men are superior” and didn’t give women as much credit as compared to today. Thankfully it’s not like back then. Back then sucked in terms of everyone having rights.



Yep, that's pretty much what I had in mind. And hey....have you been reading my diary!? 🤔
/ 20 posts
27 Jan 22 7:10 pm
Yep, that's pretty much what I had in mind. And hey....have you been reading my diary!? 🤔[/quote]

Nope lol
/ 220 posts
29 Jan 22 12:11 am
Blake_MetalHead wrote:
Yep, that's pretty much what I had in mind. And hey....have you been reading my diary!? 🤔



Nope lol


Well....stop stealing my thoughts then. LOL